MSI K8T Neo: Basic Features

 Motherboard Specifications
CPU Interface Socket-754
Chipset VIA K8T800 Northbridge
VIA 8237 Southbridge
Bus Speeds 190 MHz to 280 MHz (in 1 MHz increments)
AGP/PCI Speeds None**
Core Voltages Supported +3.3%, +5%, +6.6%, +8.0%. +10%, +11%, +15%
AGP Voltages Supported Auto, 1.55V to 1.85V (0.05V increments)
DRAM Voltages Supported Auto, 2.55V to 2.85V (in 0.5V increments)
Chipset Voltage None
Memory Slots 3 x 184-pin DDR DIMM Slots
Support to 2GB DDR 400/333/266
Expansion Slots 1 AGP 8X Slot
5 PCI Slots
Onboard RAID VIA 8237 supports 2 SATA drives in Raid 0/1 configurations
Promise 20378 supports 2 SATA + 2 IDE device in RAID 0/1/0+1
Onboard USB 2.0/IEEE-1394 8 USB 2.0 supported through VIA8237 VIA VT6307L Firewire for 2 ports
Onboard LAN Realtek 8100C 10/100
Onboard Audio Realtek ALC655 AC’97 6-Channel
Onboard Serial ATA Four IDE drives provided by 2 IDE connectors by VIA 8237
Two SATA connectors by VIA 8237
2 SATA+ 2 IDE by Promise 20378
BIOS Revision 1.0
** The tested board had no provisions for fixed AGP/PCI. However, shipping BIOS may or may not supply this option. MSI states that they hope to provide AGP/PCI fix option in the next 2 to 3 weeks.



Gigabit LAN is provided by the Realtek 8110S 10/100/1000 chip.



MSI’s proprietary CoreCell provides “Dynamic Overclocking”.



In addition to the two SATA connectors driven by the VIA 8237 Southbridge, MSI adds the Promise 20378 controller for 2 additional SATA ports and a 3rd IDE connecor supporting RAID 0/1/0+1.

MSI K8T Neo: Packaging & Board Layout MSI K8T Neo: BIOS and Overclocking
Comments Locked

12 Comments

View All Comments

  • Anonymous User - Friday, September 26, 2003 - link

    #5
    I old too, but still keep buing from AMD, Intel is way too expensive for as in Latin America, and give no clear advantage for a programmer/gamer like me.
    If you been having problems with AMD, surely your are building AMD chips with PCCHIPs mainboards, and Pentiums with Intel boards, you are a smart guy!
    So, if you gonna build a modern PC, you'll experience problems becouse WinXP didn't include drivers for new chipsets, so, for it all going like a charm, you need an Intel Pentium III and a Intel 2001's mainboard, anything newer, you gonna have to look for drivers, whatever the platform you choose.
  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, September 24, 2003 - link

    #10 -
    You are absolutely correct in theory. However, when we moved from the Ti4600 to the ATI 9800 PRO, our encoding scores on the P4 went up about 35-45%. Don't ask me why. They did not change on the Athlon, which had led in this area before. That is one of several reasons we will be changing to another encoding benchmark.

    If you doubt what I say, check Evan's 20-board 865/875 roundup done with the Ti 4600, then check the retest of some of the top boards we include in our more recent P4 reviews. Evan did the original and the update tests, and I have confirmed his results.
  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, September 24, 2003 - link

    Since when does the video card have ANYTHING to do with DivX encoding? That is a purely CPU and RAM issue, even playback is not influenced too much by the video card anymore (speed not quality...that is an entirely different issue).
  • Zoomer - Wednesday, September 24, 2003 - link

    Hey, could you please touch on what DAC chip is powering these setups? A picture would be nice too.

    Envy 24bit audio would be an utter waste if some crap Realtek codec was used. It would be good if this was highlighted so that motherboard manufacturers catering to the higher end of the market will take notice.

    Chaintech apparantly took note of the fact that you guys bashed every single board that had the ATX connector near the board i/o ports. Despite it being a non issue. That thick bundle can be routed so that the interference with airflow is minimised.
  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, September 24, 2003 - link

    Please, please, please stop using Flash for graphs.
  • dvinnen - Tuesday, September 23, 2003 - link

    #5: Youe funny. Constant screw ups? It's Intell who has had to have 3 or so recalls over the last 4-5 years. And theres that bug with the Itantic which the only way to fix is to lower the clock to 800 mhz. AMD is the one who keeps screwing up?
  • Wesley Fink - Tuesday, September 23, 2003 - link

    #3 and #4 - Thank you. Now corrected.

    Just before posting we decided to combine the 3 reviews into one larger launch review. Unfortunately I had used the same name for two different pictures and the first one was picked up. There is a socket closeup of the FIC that never made it to the server.
  • Anonymous User - Tuesday, September 23, 2003 - link

    yeah, about the only good thing coming out of this is the price drops soon. Otherwise still the same stupid +-5FPS differences = waste of time/effert to get excited about.

    i used to love amd, but just got tired of their constant screw ups, so anymore i personally don't care what stupid thing they come out with, i won't waste my time with it.

    Perhaps that's cuz i'm older now and have a good job/salary and don't need/care about overclocking and or paying a few bucks more for intel quality/stability. yeah, must be just getting to be an old fogey, cuz this whole amd/intel wanna-be-war doesn't give me a hardon like it used to ;)
  • Thoreau - Tuesday, September 23, 2003 - link

    Correction, Page 11 in the index list. First pic.
  • Thoreau - Tuesday, September 23, 2003 - link

    The 2nd page of the FIC section shows a pic from the Chaintech board. Think you got that a little mixed up there.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now