Faster Graphics For Lower Prices: ATI Radeon HD 4770

88 Comments

View All Comments

• yacoub - Tuesday, April 28, 2009 - link

  A 256-bit version (and thus able to run lower clockspeeds but get the same performance) would make a great passively-cooled GPU.

• PrinceGaz - Wednesday, April 29, 2009 - link

  By 256-bit version, do you mean the memory-bus width? All that would achieve is allow them to use slower memory (GDDR3 instead of GDDR5) and would have no effect on the speed the GPU itself needs to be clocked at, and therefore the temperature it would run at.
  
  Speaking of which, I don't think temperatures were mentioned in the article (goes to check).

• Veteran - Tuesday, April 28, 2009 - link

  I read the review completely and i clearly saw the 4770 leading the GTS 250 in most games. After reading the conclusion i was a little bit dissapointed at Anandtech. The 4770 which costs around 100$ clearly outperforms a 130$+ part while consuming lower power. Still the conclusion is not very positive... How can this happen?
  This is on of the best cards at the moment price/performance wise, so why doesn't Anandtech recommend this card? Scared to loose good relationships with nVidia? The last couple of months you can clearly see where anandtech is going to... It's really sad, since this was one of the best around.

• crimson117 - Tuesday, April 28, 2009 - link

  You don't think this is a AMD-supportive conclusion?
  
  "It isn't clear when NVIDIA will have a part in this generation of their architecture that competes in the near $100 market, but in the meantime the option is certainly clear: the Radeon HD 4770 is the way to go for now."

• flipmode - Tuesday, April 28, 2009 - link

  Maybe you're high? Read:
  
  
  "As for the competition, the 4770 comes out on top in the games we tested."
  
  "the option is certainly clear: the Radeon HD 4770 is the way to go for now."
  
  
  What more do you want? A all out denouncement of Nvidia?

• strikeback03 - Tuesday, April 28, 2009 - link

  Well, checking Newegg right now, there are 4 4770 options available (interestingly enough, all using the same non-reference cooler) all at 109.99. There are 12 GTS250 512 cards, one of which is 120 shipped, and three others at 110, 115, and 120 with rebates. Given the relatively small performance difference and the relatively small price difference, a relatively mild recommendation seems warranted. I'd imagine this will end up becoming a case of "Pick whichever brand you like better or whoever has the better price at the moment." I personally would pick an nvidia card for an extra $10 just due to the driver issues I have experienced with AMD.

• aapocketz - Wednesday, April 29, 2009 - link

  [quote]interestingly enough, all using the same non-reference cooler[/quote]
  
  yeah I cant find any that use the reference cooler reviewed in the articles on this site or others. I would prefer if its going to have a dual slot solution, that it vents the exhaust outside the case! The cooler thats on newegg is ugly too... I would have picked one up today if it looked like the ones in the article!
  
  

• balancedthinking - Tuesday, April 28, 2009 - link

  Do not forget the 10$ mail in rebates @ newegg, so the 4770 IS cheaper.
  
  The 4770 also uses way less power and it is even more more strange to see Derek bitching about the naming of the card instead of looking at the OC ability.
  
  The German site pcgameshardware.de was able to reach a massive overlock, leading to a stunning 25% performance improvement.

• RagingDragon - Wednesday, May 13, 2009 - link

  I guess the reviewer didn't have time for OC testing, and thus chose to fill the space with ranting instead.

• strikeback03 - Tuesday, April 28, 2009 - link

  Those $10 MIRs were not there when I checked before writing that. I also wouldn't be surprised to see bigger rebates on the nvidia hardware within a day or two.