Looking Back Pt. 3: The 6800 Ultra, ForceWare, and the Future
by Ryan Smith on May 11, 2006 4:00 AM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
Battlefield 2
As the newest game in our latest investigation, Battlefield 2 is almost too new to include. With only a handful of drivers released in the lifetime of the game, there's a lack of data points to work with to draw a strong conclusion. Given the number of requests to include this game, however, we have tested it with all of the drivers released since its launch. As a primarily large multiplayer game, Battlefield 2 strikes an interesting balance between the desire for high quality graphics and the need to be able to render a large firefight without slowing a system to a crawl. Battlefield 2 also is a unique game out of everything that we've tested because it's the only game here that requires pixel shading, whereas everything else merely uses the ability if it's there.
Given the rapid rise to popularity that Battlefield 2 gained upon release, it's of little surprise that NVIDIA took a chance to optimize their drivers here. What is interesting is that in most games the largest performance improvements come with HQ settings as opposed to running with everything turned off, but that is not the case here. Instead we have a rare inversion where there is a greater improvement when AA/AF are turned off, which would further confirm BF2's status as a game heavily GPU dependant.
ForceWare 77.72 versus 84.21
Mouse over for 84.21
Our image quality tests continue to be a case of "no news is good news." There was no change in render output even with the change in performance.
24 Comments
View All Comments
LoneWolf15 - Thursday, May 11, 2006 - link
Currently they are, yes. But some years back, they sucked.That's true. However, "some years back" is around the time of the Radeon 8500, far before the 9xxx line or the X800 line. This issue is no longer relevant, and yet people who haven't used ATI cards in years flog this dead horse over and over again.
ATI isn't perfect; their multimedia cards (i.e. TV tuners) still need work in the software department. However, it's been a long time since ATI has had serious driver issues, and many who haven't had an ATI card since Rage128/Radeon/Radeon 8500 days talk as if things haven't changed.
Powermoloch - Thursday, May 11, 2006 - link
I've been using Ati's drivers for quite sometime, and I noticed a gradual increase of performance from my experience. Especially on the 3dmark scores lol.MrKaz - Thursday, May 11, 2006 - link
What’s the problem with Control Panel?I like it a lot. Ati drop it in 5.11, I keep it installed with driver 6.4 and have no problems.
poohbear - Thursday, May 11, 2006 - link
have u even owned an ATI card? i'm currently running a 6800gt, but my experience w/ the 9800pro was great and i dont know what u're talking about w/ your driver instability comment. maybe u should read the article again, it praises ati's driver team quite a bit.